No Goes

thechickenhouse wrote:http://www.supre.com.au/CRUSH-LOOK-TIGHTS.aspx?p51106

THIS IS NOT A GOOD LOOK ON ANYONE AND SOME CHICKADEE CAME INTO THE LIBRARY TODAY WEARING THESE AS PANTS WITH A CROPPED HOODIE AND HER UNDERPANTS WERE ELECTRIC BLUE AND I COULD SEE THEM.



Also, amazing how I knew exactly what site to go to to find them, hey?

Honestly?!?!?!

Jeggings are no deal
LEGGINGS as pants are NO DEAL
CREAM LEGGINGS AS PANTS?!?! ARGH!!!

Honestly, I think Supre needs to be BANNED from creating shit fashion!!!

Supre used to be good for getting basics like singlets and work pants and plain tees, now it is pure shit!

They still have some good basics in there, and there's one dress I really like in royal blue (just love that shade) but I can't make it past the terrible techno music and over-sprayed Impulse to actually try anything on.

The whole store is just yuck.

Yeah I went in there last week to look for horribly tacky clothes for my friend's "People of Walmart" party, but I just felt dirty and walked straight back out again.

Oh another thing I don't get, good looking girls at gigs wearing funny pointy shoes, tights, big ass granny jumpers and nerd glasses? I don't understand the appeal AT ALL, is it supposed to be an alternative to a chastity belt or something :S

I think it's adorable!

Like hipsters? Or something different.
I think wearing glasses when you dont have to is pretty offensive.

Um, I think they are trying to be hipsters but failing, like a chain store hipster? And glasses with no glass in them. I guess it's the same as how everyone was dressing punk/emo a few years ago maybe.

If people who wear glasses get 'offended' because people who don't need to wear glasses are wearing fake ones, they really need to get a grip and probably leave the house a little more often.

I wish I didn't have to wear glasses when I'm reading so it's pretty annoying when people wear them just because it's cool. That's just my personal opinion.

Why do people think wearing glasses is cool? I hate having poor eyesight and having to wear them or I'd be blind. If people want poor vision to wear glasses I'll gladly trade them my short sightedness for their perfect vision

I can see both sides. I have 20/20 vision and I'm very fond of it, but damn I like glasses. I don't want to be blind but I REALLY want an excuse to wear glasses.

I do find it a bit annoying and posey when people parade around in frames they don't need, though. So I'd be a hypocrite if I caved and started wearing glasses I don't need.

(I gorge on sunglasses instead.)

I don't find it particularly offensive, just stupid. What really offends me is that I DO need glasses but the trendy oversized ones don't suit me so I'm still not cool, haha. Although I do see (pun not intended) why people would be offended, like I always thought the whole glasses and nana blouses was worn somewhat ironically, a bit anti-fashion if you will, and if you think about it like that it is kind of offensive to those who have to wear them because instead of it being ironic it's life.

Im always do tempted to stick my finger through frames without lenses.

I just hate it when people start trying on eachothers frames then get really pissy at me because I wont pass mine around. Sorry, but lwnsesfor depth perception are fucking ridiculously expensivr and my glasses are not toys.

Subie wrote:I don't find it particularly offensive, just stupid. What really offends me is that I DO need glasses but the trendy oversized ones don't suit me so I'm still not cool, haha.

Story of my liiiiife

thechickenhouse wrote:but lwnsesfor depth perception

Maybe you need stronger glasses soon anyway?

Hells yes.

Workmate's sister just emailed us to say there's a sales rep in at her work for an interview wearing a suit jacket (nice), collared shirt (nice), black heels (nice), and tights.

Not jeggings, not leggings, TIGHTS. As in, opaque stockings.

What the...?!?

A friend of mine who just moved to Melbourne saw a girl wearing tights the other day!!

but but but they do realise you can see your butt in those and that they are tights

musicaddict wrote:but but but they do realise you can see your butt in those and that they are tights

I was going to say exactly this!

I SEE THAT ALL THE TIME ON THE TRAIN ON THE WAY TO WORK.

I dont get it.

Full on tights with bits for your feet and a gusset with a lovely corporate type jacket and shoes.

First time I saw it I honestly thought that the girl had forgotten to put her skirt on and wanted to say something to her, but now ive seen so many people doing it that there must be some weird subculture of morons in Melbourne who think that tights are pants.

Maybe it's like corporate nudism?

Today I was at the Levis store in the city trying to find some jeans that actually fit. The girl was being really helpful, bringing me different styles and sizes from the Curve ID range. But then...SHE SUGGESTED I TRY ON JEGGINGS because, "They suit your shape." NO. Jeggings do not suit ANY shape! And they are not pants!

Spongebob_rox wrote:Today I was at the Levis store in the city trying to find some jeans that actually fit. The girl was being really helpful, bringing me different styles and sizes from the Curve ID range. But then...SHE SUGGESTED I TRY ON JEGGINGS because, "They suit your shape." NO. Jeggings do not suit ANY shape! And they are not pants!

QFT